A school-owned framework for managing U.S. university sport recruitment.

Align counselling, sport, and family guidance through one repeatable internal process — managed by school staff, owned by the school.

Request the Briefing Document →
School-owned
No ongoing dependency or licensing fees
Designed for counselling and sports staff
Implemented across Australia, Asia-Pacific, and North America

Most schools manage visibility at the start and outcomes at the end. The middle stage is where the process breaks down.

Stage Typical institutional support
Initial identification — coach recognition, early talent assessment Present at most schools
Ongoing management — coach communication, documentation, deadlines, family guidance, and staff coordination Typically absent
Commitment and transition — offer management, decision support, handover planning Present at most schools

This is where outcomes are determined. It is the stage CAPS structures.

Everything needed to manage the pathway internally.

The goal is straightforward: consistent guidance for student-athletes pursuing U.S. university opportunities — without relying on individual staff knowledge or external agents.

Student tracking across year levels and sports
Staff coordination workflows
Recruitment timelines mapped to the school calendar
Family and student pathway guides
Documentation library and templates
Handoff protocols for staff transitions
See the full framework contents →

A complete internal process. Owned by the school. Permanently.

Staff know what to do and when.

Roles are defined. Timelines are mapped to the school calendar. Every student in the recruitment pathway has clear institutional oversight.

The process survives staff transitions.

All documentation and protocols are held by the school. A new Head of Sport or counsellor inherits a functioning process, not a knowledge gap.

Families receive consistent, school-endorsed guidance.

Students navigate through a school-coordinated pathway. External agents operating outside school visibility become less necessary.


No ongoing dependency. No access that lapses. The process belongs to the school.

Schools typically come to CAPS at one of five moments.

Increased family demand for structured U.S. university sport guidance.
A staff transition that disrupted the informal knowledge the school relied on.
Growing student interest across multiple sports — beyond what individual coaches can manage.
Awareness that peer schools are formalising this pathway.
A student or cohort that revealed a gap in the school's ability to provide consistent, coordinated guidance.

The approach adapts to the institutional context — not the other way around.

CAPS has been implemented across independent and international school contexts in Australia, Southeast Asia, and North America. Three school environments appear most consistently.

Emerging pathway schools

Schools with smaller cohorts and limited existing recruitment infrastructure. Implementation focuses on scholarship pathway visibility, family education, and identifying students who may not recognise their own eligibility for U.S. programmes.

High-academic independent schools

In academically selective environments, student-athletes frequently underutilise U.S. sport recruitment opportunities — including at highly selective universities. Implementation focuses on pathway visibility and coordination between academic and sport planning.

Established sport programmes

Schools that produce high-level athletes but rely on individual coaches or informal knowledge. CAPS introduces cross-sport continuity and consistency — so outcomes are not concentrated in one sport or one staff member's network.

Same core approach. Implementation calibrated to each school's context.

Students supported through CAPS-informed pathways have gone on to engage with programmes across a wide range of collegiate environments.

Ivy League institutions including Yale University, Princeton University, Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and Brown University.
NCAA Division I programmes including Stanford University, Duke University, University of Michigan, and Northwestern University.
Division II, Division III, NAIA, and scholarship placements across multiple regions and sport disciplines.

Presented as institutional context only. Individual outcomes depend on each student's circumstances. CAPS does not represent or place individual athletes.

Schools engage with CAPS through one of two models.

The appropriate model is identified during the briefing document review and, where relevant, a short orientation conversation.

CAPS is designed for a specific type of school.

Appropriate for
  • Independent schools with a dedicated Head of Sport, Athletic Director, or college counselling function.
  • International schools placing students into U.S. university sport programmes with regularity — or building toward that capacity.
  • Schools with informal support but no documented, repeatable internal process.
  • Institutions where counselling and sports staff are both involved in recruitment without a shared coordination structure.
  • Schools that have experienced disruption through staff transitions.
What CAPS is not
  • A recruiting agency, athlete representation model, or placement service. CAPS does not act on behalf of individual students.
  • An outsourced or ongoing external consulting model. The process is implemented by school staff and owned by the school permanently.
  • A resource for families seeking direct support outside of a school-managed process.
  • Appropriate for schools without internal staff capacity to operate an institutional coordination process.

Request the CAPS Briefing Document.

A concise overview of the framework, implementation process, school fit criteria, and engagement options.

Designed for school leaders evaluating how to strengthen their U.S. university sport pathway.

Request Briefing Document → Sent directly to your inbox. No call required.